新閣揆誰來當
馬蕭配大勝,全民對於新政府「拼經濟、救台灣」有著高度的期待,而受外界矚目的閣揆人選更以具有深厚財經背景為呼聲最高。但,28日馬英九接受聯合報獨家專訪時曾表示,閣揆人選「定得早不如選得好」,除了才德兼備而且德勝於才外,省籍、性別都不是重要的事,能在上任不太長的一段時間內「Get the job done」,就是一個好的閣揆。
據報導,曾任經濟部長、經濟會主委的江丙坤(圖一右)呼聲極高,江在2004連宋配競選正副總統時也曾被點名為行政院閣揆人選,又江丙坤近日強調主張調整兩岸政策,希望能促使兩岸儘快實現通航,無疑成了外界關注的新政府閣揆人選。而蕭前內閣行政院副院長劉兆玄(圖二)也是熱門閣揆人選之一,曾任交通部長、國科會主委的劉兆玄即是湊成馬蕭配成功的關鍵人物之一。外界猜測雖然劉兆玄已在2004重返學術界,不過副總統當選人蕭萬長仍可主導財經事務,因此閣揆人選未必要是財經界背景。據報導,主管國家貨幣政策,對處理通膨有豐富經驗的現任中央銀行總裁彭淮南(圖三)也被傳出是閣揆的黑馬人選之一。雖然馬英九對於閣揆人選三緘其口,但隨著五二○的接近,馬政府的閣揆人選出爐名單指日可待,在全民力拼經濟的期待下,誰又是你心目中最理想的閣揆人選呢?為什麼?
(圖一)
(圖二)
(圖三)
留言
周美青做閣揆.
發表: 武照 | March 31, 2008 07:55 PM
劉兆玄 is more popular than others. He was vice prime minister before.
發表: j. Liu | March 31, 2008 08:29 PM
彭淮南 seems lack 親和力 when he faces media and civilians.
發表: k. wu | March 31, 2008 08:41 PM
馬英九調侃自己說, "現在人民好像很怕學法律的", 這是因為民盡黨被那些知法玩法的律師團(律師治國)搞垮了, 真是 "成也律師, 敗也律師".
我連學者都怕了, 學者如李X哲之流, 話說得好聽, 能真正做事嗎?
學者從政很不合適, 曾任事務官最好.
我還是贊成蕭萬長兼任閣揆, 否則浪費了他的經歷.
發表: 路人甲 | April 1, 2008 12:48 AM
江丙坤, the name means firey earth.
劉兆玄, means billions hue.
彭淮南, means for the south.
周美青 is the best. She will keep Taiwan beautiful and young.
發表: 龍應台 | April 1, 2008 12:56 AM
Democracy is based on equality and justice.
發表: Law abiding citizen | April 1, 2008 01:00 AM
周美青做閣揆.::::好像大陸文革時期﹐ 毛當總統﹐ 江青當行政院長一樣﹐ .把大陸搞的亂七八糟.
發表: funny and silly idea | April 1, 2008 01:12 AM
Funny and Silly:
There are couples in America who divorce just to save taxes. There are also parents who divorce to become a single parent to help their sons/daughters get financial aids from Ivy League schools.
So I wouldn't be supprised if 周美青 wanna divorce 馬英九. So she can be totally free to do whatever she pleases, including accepting the position of the Chief of the Executive Yuan. She is financially independent and she is the bread earner of the Ma's family because 馬英九 has been unemployed for a year. She has a master's degree from NYU and worked in financial world for years. Her virtue is unquestionable and she can make decisions like a man.
馬英九 can marry a younger woman who will bear him a son.
發表: April Fool's Day | April 1, 2008 03:21 AM
馬英九PTT
發表: 驚某大丈夫 | April 1, 2008 03:29 AM
毛江怎麼能跟馬周比?
發表: Anonymous | April 1, 2008 03:39 AM
愚人節馬扁會:馬+扁=騙
發表: 誠信第一 | April 1, 2008 03:53 AM
Get Lee Yuan Tseh. He has all kinds of ideas. He could reinvent Taiwan in Nobel manner...
發表: Not April Fool Joke | April 1, 2008 08:17 AM
政治是騙人的藝術. 扁和李登輝是大騙, 馬是小騙, 不騙不能搞政治.
You can fool some of the people all of the time; all of the people some of the time; but not all of the people all of the time.
發表: Dala Lama | April 1, 2008 11:22 AM
周美青真是上天派來扶助馬英九的現代奇女子!加油!
發表: Olivia | April 1, 2008 11:29 AM
Interesting! Time is changed. From 1950 to 1975, nobody dared to ask Madame Chiang to be the President of Executive Yuan, even she had popular international prestige, strong political background, experience and beautiful English. Today, 6 out of 12 comments, asked Chou Mei Ching as the president of executive yuan? A master degree from NYU and the "director of law office" at a bank doesn't mean anything. Compared to Madame Chiang, she has nothing and you guys asked her to be the p. of e.y? You are killing her in Legislative Yuan when facing DPPs. Please don't diefy Mr Ma, and beautify Mrs Ma. Your comments should make some senses. Let's go back to Chiang, Liu and Poon.
發表: Anonymous | April 1, 2008 11:53 AM
Yes, Olivia, she is Mr Ma's good wife, but the President of Executive Yuan is too heavy for her. There are millions of millions of "Chi-Lu-Zi" in Taiwan.
發表: KMT 1 | April 1, 2008 12:54 PM
媒體曾以馬只有二女的事問他﹐ 他說﹐有子有女固然好﹐但有那麼多 姓馬的人﹐
不差我一人﹐
發表: don't worry about Ma. | April 1, 2008 01:52 PM
April fools
發表: Anonymous | April 1, 2008 01:54 PM
周美青 is less... less...qualified for Prime Minister, not even for a member of cabinet.
發表: Anonymous | April 1, 2008 02:09 PM
I totally and 100% agreed with you, Anonymous. Why we brought her for discussion?
發表: Nonsense | April 1, 2008 02:13 PM
馬不搞裙帶關係﹐ (用自家人擔任要職 )﹐ 一但落人口實﹐ 會葬送他的政治生命﹐
. In the past 8 years, DPP officers hired their relatives to take governmental positions, the pan-blue legislators 不客氣質問他們.
發表: 裙帶關係﹐ is prohibited in modernized and advanced democratic country. | April 1, 2008 02:14 PM
Bill gates the inventor of internet felt so guilty for making so much money that he left his home and wife to join Dalai Lama in human rights crusade.
發表: Anonymous | April 1, 2008 02:14 PM
I agree with 裙帶關係's words.
以前趙建銘比別人"加速"升為住院醫生﹐???? National Defense Department "破例"增加錄取名額﹐ 使 陳致中得軍法官資格﹐???? It has given Taiwanese very very very bad impressions on the first family.
發表: 裙帶關係 , no more! It is unfair. | April 1, 2008 02:42 PM
Ma has said N times that no relatives in the government. My friends in Taiwan voted for him because he is so righteous, clean and humble. On the other hand, we should thank Chen who brought his relatives, family members to the government and DPP lost the election.
發表: Different Horse-Ma | April 1, 2008 03:11 PM
內舉不避親.
發表: 武照 | April 1, 2008 09:23 PM
內舉不避親???? The "親"is not qualified to take the job . Why you, 武照brought her for discussion?
發表: 武 Ze Tian | April 1, 2008 10:29 PM
內舉不避親. Confucius' words may not always right. Times changed.
發表: Anonymous | April 1, 2008 10:52 PM
讓我們回到正題吧﹐不要再消費周美青了﹐談談比較合格的人選吧。
發表: 讓我們回到正題吧 | April 1, 2008 10:55 PM
這問題要我怎麼回答呢?
要不讓誰當閣揆,寫也寫不完。
要讓誰來當閣揆,寫也寫不出。
發表: 啞口無言 | April 1, 2008 11:38 PM
Freedom of speech.
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 03:11 AM
龍應台 is the answer. Her name says it all - a dragon comes to Taiwan.
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 05:01 AM
內舉不避親 was not a Confucius saying. It was Chou Gon's.
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 05:03 AM
龍應台:
How can a prime minister be selected based on nothing but his or her name? You should have your head examined.
發表: For name-sake's sake | April 2, 2008 03:08 PM
For name-sake's sake: Don't you know it is an "ironic" opinion? Don't be too serious, please. Do you think Ma will consider her? If so, Ma should have his head examined.
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 03:23 PM
"Ching", which "Ching"? Clean is OK, dirty is NO.
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 03:28 PM
Lack of creativity and lack of humor
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 05:44 PM
"Lack of creativity and lack of humor"--who are you talking about? Is that Lung? or Chiang(Jiang), Liu, Poon, Chou ....? please let me know.
發表: Anonymous | April 2, 2008 06:01 PM
內舉不避親是出自《呂氏春秋• 去私》:
晉平公問于祁黃羊曰:南陽無令,其誰可而為之?黃羊對曰:解狐可。平公曰:解狐非子之仇也?曰:君問可,非問臣之仇也。平公曰:善。遂用之。國人稱善焉。
居有間,平公又問祁黃羊曰:國無尉,其誰可為之?對曰:午可。平公曰:午
非子之子耶?對曰:君問可,非問臣之子也。平公曰:善。又遂用之。國人稱
善焉。
孔子聞之,曰:善哉,祁黃羊之論也!外舉不避仇,內舉不避子,祁黃羊可謂公矣
發表: 打個岔 | April 3, 2008 02:07 AM
孔子聞之,曰:善哉,祁黃羊之論也!外舉不避仇,......""孔子聞之,曰"內舉不避子",祁黃羊可謂公矣
發表: 孔子聞之,...曰內舉不避子.... | April 3, 2008 03:13 AM
馬曰: 善, 外舉不避獨, 內舉不避妻.
發表: 大融合 | April 3, 2008 09:14 AM
論理上,國民黨是立院多數黨,它的黨魁吳伯雄應該當行政院長.
選將上,宋楚瑜最夠資格.宋氏行政經驗和歷練無人能出其右,省長時政績不錯,施政待人有經國先生風範,用人也能舉賢.與共產黨對談,最終協議猶勝國民黨連戰所為.0六年紅衫軍倒扁,宋獨立頂言支持施明德不進攻總統府決定,而免除全國百萬人反貪腐運動,成流血暴動收場.宋氏不居小節,才堪大用,唯一缺點是可能義氣用事.
其他:江丙坤劉兆玄歐晉德都是不錯人選,但就建立憲政成規的長遠角度審視,由吳伯雄出任才是最正確的選項.
發表: Anonymous | April 3, 2008 01:22 PM
In 2000 Soong spinned off from KMT to run for the presidency. In 2004 he teamed up Lien for VP. In 2007, he ran for the Mayor of Tipei City. He lost all campaigns. He is a loser. His worst mischief was he kicked Lee Denhuie into the president chair.
發表: Anonymous | April 3, 2008 03:30 PM
Do you know that all fingers pointed to Little Soong from 1988 to present? This man has no political moral. If you recommend this Tricky Dick as the President of Executive Yuan, he someday will kick President Ma out of the chair. Wu, who is quite old and had a stroke about 5 years ago. You will kill him.
發表: A#3 | April 3, 2008 04:00 PM
外舉,內舉,能舉就好。
近親,遠親,六親不避。
發表: 萎哥 | April 3, 2008 04:19 PM
My friend, A (too many As), I agree with you. If Soong is the boss of Executive Yuan, no matter his executive experience and expertise, it is against President Ma's principle. Furthermore, he will again destroy KMT and Ma.
發表: Peter Hsu | April 3, 2008 04:24 PM
Ma, Soong, and Mao are all Hunanese. They surely have something in common.
發表: Anonymous | April 3, 2008 05:21 PM
Lingo sounds like gay...
發表: Anonymous | April 3, 2008 05:22 PM
What a coincidence! It is God's will! No Tseng Kuo-fan(a Hunanese), no Ching dynasty. What you said?
發表: Peter Hsu | April 3, 2008 05:28 PM
Peter Shoe:
What said I? I said you got it all wrong! When Tseng came on the stage, the Ching Dynasty had been in existence for a while already.
發表: Pede De Shoooooo | April 3, 2008 09:37 PM
Ching Dynasty would have been toppled, had it not been Tseng's Hunan troop that defeated Taipin Heavenly Kingdom.
發表: Anonymous | April 3, 2008 11:23 PM
Chiank Kaishek's first wife's name was Mao Fumei. Chiang did not like her. I guess partly because his archenemy was Mao Zedong.
The two Mao's might be relatives 500 years ago.
發表: Anonymous | April 3, 2008 11:31 PM